|
|
|
Mathematical and Statistical Psychology |
|
Please make a note of the paper numbers before clicking the link below |
81 |
* Rousseau, B. (2007). Simultaneous Estimations of Multiple Product Similarities Using a New Discrimination Protocol. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22, 533–549. |
76 |
* Ennis, D.M. (2006). Sources and Influence of Perceptual Variance: Comment on Dzhafarov's Regular Minimality Principle. Journal of Mathmatical Psychology, 50, 66-73. |
71 |
* Ennis, D.M., and Rousseau, B. (2004). Motivations
for product consumption: Application of a probabilistic
model to adolescent smoking. Journal of Sensory
Studies, 19(2), 107-117. |
65 |
* Ashby, F. G. and Ennis, D. M. (2002). A
Thurstone-Coombs model of concurrent ratings with
sensory and liking dimensions. Journal of
Sensory Studies, 17, 43-59. |
64 |
* Rousseau, B. and Ennis, D.M. (2002), The multiple dual-pair method. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(6),
1008-1014. |
60 |
* Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M. (2001). The
power of the "A"-"Not A" method. Journal of
Sensory Studies, 16, 343-359. |
57 |
* Rousseau, B. and Ennis, D. M. (2001). A
Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination
method. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1083-1090. |
42 |
* Ennis, J. M., Ennis, D. M., Yip, D. and O’Mahony,
M. (1998). Thurstonian
models for variants of the method of tetrads. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 51, 205-215. |
36 |
* Ennis, D. M. and O’Mahony, M. (1995). Probabilistic
models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 21(5), 1-10. |
34 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Johnson, N. L. (1994). A
general model for preferential and triadic choice
in terms of central F distribution functions. Psychometrika, 59(1), 91-96. |
33 |
* Geelhoed, E.N., MacRae, A.W., and Ennis, D. M.
(1994). Preference
gives more consistent judgments than oddity only if
the task can be modeled as forced choice. Perception
& Psychophysics , 55(4),
473-477. |
31 |
* Ennis, D. M.(1993). A
single multidimensional model for discrimination,
identification, and preferential choice. Acta Psychologica, 84, 17-27. |
30 |
* Ennis, D. M.(1993). Is
preferential choice affected by attribute scoring
in blind consumer product testing? Presented
at the ASTM Meeting, Deerfield Beach. |
29 |
* Ennis, D.M. and Ashby, F.G. (1993). The relative sensitivities of same-different and identification
judgment models to perceptual dependence. Psychometrika, 58(2), 257-279. |
27 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Johnson, N. L. (1993). Thurstone-Shepard similarity models as special cases
of moment generating functions. Journal of
Mathematical Psychology, 37(1),
104-110. |
26 |
* Ennis, D. M. (1993). The power of sensory discrimination methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8,
353-370. |
25 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1992). Probabilistic psychophysics with noisy stimuli. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23,
221-234. |
23 |
* Ennis, D. M. (1992). Modeling
similarity and identification when there are momentary
fluctuations in psychological magnitudes. In F.
Gregory Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception
and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
22 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K., (1992). A
general probabilistic model for triad discrimination,
preferential choice, and two-alternative identification.
In F. Gregory Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models
of Perception and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates. |
19 |
* Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M.(1991). A
simple multivariate probabilistic model for preferential
and triadic choices. Psychometrika, 56(1),
69-75. |
18 |
* Ennis, D. M. (1990). The
relative power of difference testing methods in sensory
evaluation. Food Technology, 44,
114, 116 & 117. |
16 |
* Ennis, D. M., Mullen, K., Fritjers. J. E. R. and
Tindall, J. (1989). Decision
conflicts: Within-trial resampling in Richardson’s
method of triads. British Journal of Mathematical
and Statistical Psychology Society, 42,
265-269. |
14 |
* Ennis, D. M., Mullen, K. and Fritjers, J. E. R.
(1988). Variants of the
method of triads: Unidimensional Thurstonian models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 41, 25-36. |
13 |
* Mullen, K., Ennis, D. M., de Doncker, E., and Kapenga,
J. A. (1988). Models
for the duo-trio and triangular methods. Biometrics, 44, 1169-1175. |
12 |
* Ennis, D. M., Palen, J. and Mullen, K. (1988). A multidimensional stochastic
theory of similarity. Journal of Mathematical
Psychology, 32(4), 449-465. |
11 |
* Ennis, D. M. (1988). Confusable
and discriminable stimuli: Comments on Nosofsky (1986)
and Shepard (1986). Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 117(4),
408-411. |
9 |
* Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M. (1987). Mathematical
formulation of multivariate Euclidean models for discrimination
methods. Psychometrika, 52(2),
235-249. |
8 |
* Kapenga, J.A, Mullen, K, de Doncker, E., and Ennis,
D. M. (1987). The integration of the multivariate normal density
function for the triangular method. Numerical Integration. In P. Keast and G. Fairweather (Eds.)., Boston,
MA: Reidel Publishing Company, 321-328. |
7 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1986). A
multivariate model for discrimination methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30(2),
206-219. |
6 |
* Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M.(1985). Fractional factorials in product development. Food Technology, 39(5), 90,92,94,97-98, 100, & 102-103. |
|
5
|
* Ennis,
D. M. and Mullen, K. (1985). Theoretical
aspects of sensory discrimination. Chemical
Senses, 11(4), 513-522. |
4 |
* Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1985). The
effect of dimensionality on results from the triangular
method. Chemical Senses, 10(4),
605-608. |
Request a Reprint by entering the ID number(s) from the left column
A copy of the corresponding paper(s) will be sent to you by e-mail
|
| |
| Go
Back |
|
|
