IFP

The Institute for Perception
     Developing and Applying Advanced Research Tools
          for Human Perceptual Measurement

 
Latest News

Fall 2010 Short Course
Drivers of Liking®, Segmentation and Portfolio Optimization
The Greenbrier, White Sulphur Springs, WV
November 8-12, 2010

                         more »

IFPress 13.3 Now Available
How to Account for "No Difference/Preference" Counts

                         more »

Institute for Perception Award
Now accepting applications
for the 2010 Institute for Perception award
                         more »

 
Site Map »
All Published Papers
Please make a note of the paper numbers before clicking the link below
87
Ennis, D.M. and Ennis, J.M. (2009). Hypothesis testing for equivalence based on symmetric open intervals. Communications in Statistics, 38(11), 1792-1803.
86
Casale, M.B. and Ashby, F.G. (2008). A role for the perceptual representation memory system in category learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 983-999.
85
Ennis, D., Ennis, J., Palen, J., Lampe, R. (2008). Confidence bounds for positive ratios of normal random variables. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37, 307-317.
84
Ennis, D. (2008). Rejoinder to Bi and Meyners. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 347-348.
83
Ennis, D. (2008). Response to Bi, J. (2007). Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference 18 , 500–507. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 344.
82
Ennis, D. (2008). Tables for parity testing. Journal of Sensory Studies, 23, 80 –91.
81
Rousseau, B. (2007). Simultaneous estimations of multiple product similarities using a new discrimination protocol. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22, 533–549.
80
Ashby, F.G., Ennis, J. and Spiering, B. (2007). A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychological Review, 114(3), 632-656.
79
Ishii, R., Kawaguchi, H., O'Mahony, M., Rousseau, B. (2007). Relating consumer and trained panels' discriminative sensitivities using vanilla flavored ice cream as a medium. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 89-96.
78
Ennis, J. and Wei, G. (2006). Describing the universal cover of a compact limit. Differential Geometry and its Applications, 24(5), 554–562.
77
Ashby, F.G. and Ennis, J. (2006). The role of the basal ganglia in category learning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 1-36.
76
Ennis, D.M. (2006). Sources and influence of perceptual variance: Comment on Dzhafarov's regular minimality principle. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 66-73.
75
Ashby, G. and Casale, M. (2005). Empirical dissociations between rule-based and similarity-based categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(1), 15-16.
74
Ashby, G. and Casale, M. (2005). FROST: A distributed neurocomputational model of working memory maintenance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1728-1743.
73
Lau, S., O'Mahony, M., Rousseau, B. (2004), Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 66 (3), 464-474.
72
Braun, V., Rogeaux, M., Schneid, N., O’Mahony, M., Rousseau, B. (2004), Corroborating the 2-AFC and 2-AC Thurstonian models using both a model system and sparkling water. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 501-507.
71
Ennis, D.M., and Rousseau, B. (2004). Motivations for product consumption: Application of a probabilistic model to adolescent smoking. Journal of Sensory Studies, 19(2), 107-117.
70
Ashby, G. and Casale, M. (2003). A model of dopamine modulated cortical activation. Neural Networks, 16, 973-984.
69
O'Mahony, M and Rousseau, B. (2003), Discrimination testing: A few ideas, old and new. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 157-164.
68
Ennis, D.M. (2003). Foundations of sensory science. In H.R. Moskowitz, A.M. Munoz, and M.C. Gacula (Eds.), Viewpoints and Controversies in Sensory Science and Consumer Product Testing. Trumbull, CT: Food & Nutrition Press.
67
Rousseau, B.(2003), Sensory difference testing. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. (2nd Ed., pp. 5141-5147). St. Louis: Academic Press.
66
Ashby, G. and Casale, M. (2002). The cognitive neuroscience of implicit category learning. Attention and Implicit Learning, 109-141.
65
Ashby, F. G. and Ennis, D. M. (2002). A Thurstone-Coombs model of concurrent ratings with sensory and liking dimensions. Journal of Sensory Studies, 17, 43-59.
64
Rousseau, B. and Ennis, D.M. (2002), The multiple dual-pair method. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(6), 1008-1014.
63
Rousseau, B., Stroh, S., and O'Mahony, M. (2002). Investigating more powerful discrimination tests with consumers: effects of memory and response bias. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 39-45.
62
Fukui, M., Yokotsuka, K., Ishii, R., O ’Mahony, M., and Rousseau, B. (2002). Investigation of potential taste reduction of catechin and grape seed dimeric phenols in water by wine proteins. Lebensm.-Wiss.u.-Technol., 35, 355-361.
61
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M. (2001). Statistical models for the A-Not A method. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 215-237.
60
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M. (2001). The power of the "A"-"Not A" method. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 343-359.
59
Rousseau, B. (2001). Les biais de réponse dans le cadre d'analyses discriminatives. In T.N. Urdapilleta & S.D. Huon de Kermadec (Eds.), Traité d'Evaluation Sensorielle: Aspects Cognitifs et Métrologiques des Perceptions (pp. 7-27). Paris: Dunod.
58
Ennis, D.M. (2001). Molecular mixture models: Connecting molecular events to perception. P. Given and D. Paredes, (Eds.), in Chemistry of Taste: Medhanisms, Behavior, and Mimics, San Francisco, CA: American Chemical Society.
57
Rousseau, B. and Ennis, D. M. (2001). A Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination method. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1083-1090.
56
Rousseau, B. (2001), The b-Strategy: An alternative and powerful cognitive strategy when performing sensory discrimination tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 301-318.
55
Rousseau, B. and O'Mahony, M. (2001). Investigation of the dual-pair method as a possible alternative to the triangle and same-different tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 161-178.
54
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M.(2001). Exact beta-binomial tables for small experiments. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 319-325.
53
Bi, J., Templeton-Janik, L., Ennis, J. M., and Ennis, D. M. (2000). Replicated difference and preference tests: How to account for inter-trial variation. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 269-273.
52
Ennis, D. M., and Bi, J. (2000). Multivariate quality control with applications to sensory data. Journal of Food Quality, 23, 541-552.
51
Rousseau, B. and O'Mahony, M. (2000). Investigation of the effect of within-trial retasting and comparison of the dual-pair, same-different and triangle paradigms. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 457-464.
50
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M.(1999). Beta-binomial tables for replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 347-368.
49
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M.(1999). The power of sensory discrimination methods used in replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 289-302.
48
Rousseau, B., Rogeaux, M, and O'Mahony, M. (1999). Mustard discrimination by same-different and triangle tests: Aspects of irritation, memory and t criteria. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 173-184.
47
Ennis, D. M. and Bi, J. (1999). The Dirichlet-Multinomial Model: Accounting for inter-trial variations in replicated ratings. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 321-345.
46
Bi, J. and Ennis, D. M.(1998). A Thurstonian variant of the beta-binomial model for replicated difference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 461-466.
45
Ennis, D. M. and Bi, J. (1998). The beta-binomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 389-412.
44
Bi, J., and Ennis, D. M.(1998). Sensory thresholds: Concepts and methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 133-148.
43
Ennis, D. M.(1998). Foundations of sensory science and a vision for the future. Food Technology, 52(7), 78-84, 89.
42
Ennis, J. M., Ennis, D. M., Yip, D. and O’Mahony, M. (1998). Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 205-215.
41
Kim, K., Ennis, D. M., and O'Mahony, M. (1998). A new approach to category scales of intensity II: Use of d'  values. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 251-267.
40
Rousseau, B., Meyer, A., and O'Mahony, M. (1998). Power and sensitivity of the same-different test: Comparison with triangle and duo-trio methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 149-173.
39
Bi, J., Ennis, D. M., O’Mahony, M. (1997). How to estimate and use the variance of d' from difference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 87-104.
38
Rousseau, B. and O'Mahony, M. (1997). Sensory difference tests: Thurstonian and SSA predictions for vanilla flavored yogurts. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 127-146.
37
Ennis, D. M., (1996). A general molecular model for the effect of multi-component mixtures on biological systems. Food Chemistry, 56(3), 329-335.
36
Ennis, D. M. and O’Mahony, M. (1995). Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1-10.
35
Rosett, T. R., Wu, Z., Schmidt, S. J., Ennis, D. M., and Klein, B.P. (1995). KCI, CaCI2, Na+ binding, and salt taste of gum systems. Journal of Food Science, 60(4), 849-853, 867.
34
Ennis, D. M. and Johnson, N. L. (1994). A general model for preferential and triadic choice in terms of central F distribution functions. Psychometrika, 59(1), 91-96.
33
Geelhoed, E.N., MacRae, A.W., and Ennis, D. M. (1994). Preference gives more consistent judgments than oddity only if the task can be modeled as forced choice. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(4), 473-477.
32
Tedja, S., Nonaka, R., Ennis, D. M., and O’Mahony, M. (1994). Triadic discrimination testing: Refinement of Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis approaches. Chemical Senses, 19(4), 279-301.
31
Ennis, D. M.(1993). A single multidimensional model for discrimination, identification, and preferential choice. Acta Psychologica, 84, 17-27.
30
Ennis, D. M.(1993). Is preferential choice affected by attribute scoring in blind consumer product testing? Presented at the ASTM Meeting, Deerfield Beach.
29
Ennis, D.M. and Ashby, F.G. (1993). The relative sensitivities of same-different and identification judgment models to perceptual dependence. Psychometrika, 58(2), 257-279.
28
Ennis, D. M. and Johnson, N. L. (1993). Noncentral and central chi-square, F and beta distribution functions as special cases of the distribution function of an indefinite quadratic form. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 22(3), 897-905.
27
Ennis, D. M. and Johnson, N. L. (1993). Thurstone-Shepard similarity models as special cases of moment generating functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37(1), 104-110.
26
Ennis, D. M. (1993). The power of sensory discrimination methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8, 353-370.
25
Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1992). Probabilistic psychophysics with noisy stimuli. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 221-234.
24
Ennis, D. M. (1992). Kinetic models of sweet taste. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 3, 169-173.
23
Ennis, D. M. (1992). Modeling Similarity and Identification When There Are Momentary Fluctuations in Psychological Magnitudes. In F. Gregory Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22
Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K., (1992). A General Probabilistic Model for Triad Discrimination, Preferential Choice, and Two-Alternative Identification. In F. Gregory Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21
Ennis, D. M. (1991). Molecular models based on competitive and non-competitive agonism. Chemical Senses, 16(1), 1-17.
20
Ennis, D. M. (1991). Modeling the sweet taste of mixtures. Food Technology, 45(11), 140, 142, 145.
19
Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M.(1991). A simple multivariate probabilistic model for preferential and triadic choices. Psychometrika, 56(1), 69-75.
18
Ennis, D. M. (1990). The relative power of difference testing methods in sensory evaluation. Food Technology, 44, 114, 116 & 117.
17
Ennis, D. M. (1989). A receptor model for binary mixtures applied to the sweetness of fructose and glucose: De Graaf and Frijters revisited. Chemical Senses, 14(4), 597-604.
16
Ennis, D. M., Mullen, K., Frijters. J. E. R. and Tindall, J. (1989). Decision conflicts: Within-trial resampling in Richardson’s method of triads. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology Society, 42, 265-269.
15
Seeman, J. I., Ennis, D. M., Vecor, H. V., Clawson, L., and Palen, J. (1989). The perceptual similarity of substituted benzenes and pyridines as a function of steric hindrance. Chemical Senses, 14(3), 395-405.
14
Ennis, D. M., Mullen, K. and Fritjers, J. E. R. (1988). Variants of the method of triads: Unidimensional Thurstonian models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 25-36.
13
Mullen, K., Ennis, D. M., de Doncker, E., and Kapenga, J. A. (1988). Models for the duo-trio and triangular methods. Biometrics, 44, 1169-1175.
12
Ennis, D. M., Palen, J. and Mullen, K. (1988). A multidimensional stochastic theory of similarity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32(4), 449-465.
11
Ennis, D. M. (1988). Confusable and discriminable stimuli: Comments on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 408-411.
10
Ennis, D. M. (1988). Multivariate sensory analysis. Food Technology, 42, 118, 120-122.
9
Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M. (1987). Mathematical formulation of multivariate Euclidean models for discrimination methods. Psychometrika, 52(2), 235-249.
8
Kapenga, J.A, Mullen, K, de Doncker, E., and Ennis, D. M. (1987).  The integration of the multivariate normal density function for the triangular method. Numerical Integration. P. Keast and G. Fairweather (eds.)., Reidel Publishing Company, 321-328.
7
Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1986). A multivariate model for discrimination methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30(2), 206-219.
6

Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M.(1985). Fractional factorials in product development. Food Technology, 39(5), 90,92,94,97-98, 100, & 102-103.

5
Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1985). Theoretical aspects of sensory discrimination. Chemical Senses, 11(4), 513-522.
4
Ennis, D. M. and Mullen, K. (1985). The effect of dimensionality on results from the triangular method. Chemical Senses, 10(4), 605-608.
3
Anthoney, K., Ennis, D. M., and Cook, P. (1984). Lemon juice color evaluation: Sensory and instrumental studies. Journal of Food Science, 49(6), 1435-1437.
2
Ennis, D. M., Boelens, H., Haring, H. and Bowman, P. (1982). Multivariate analysis in sensory evaluation. Food Technology, 36(11), 83-90.
1
Mullen, K. and Ennis, D. M. (1979). Rotatable designs in product development. Food Technology, 33(7), pp. 74, 75, 78, 79, and 80.

Request a Reprint by entering the ID number(s) from the left column
A copy of the corresponding paper(s) will be sent to you by e-mail

 
Copyright © 2010 The Institute for Perception. All rights reserved.
Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional